Search

Artificial intelligence: “A war is coming – and we are not ready” – AI pioneer’s dire warning - WELT

Translated title. Original: Künstliche Intelligenz: „Ein Krieg kommt auf uns zu – und wir sind nicht bereit“ – düstere Warnung des KI-Urvaters - WELT

AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio says severe outcomes from uncontrollable AI are realistic and warns that the greatest danger may not come from robots. The article is an interview about these risks and whether society is prepared.

Artificial intelligence: How dangerous is AI? Expert explains

Translated title. Original: Künstliche Intelligenz: Wie gefährlich ist KI? Expertin klärt auf

The text questions how dangerous AI is, mentions warnings about the point when AI may surpass human intellect (the singularity), and notes current unrest in the AI field, with an aside about Trump's position on participation.

The dilemma of artificial intelligence: existential threat or unparalleled promise? | Technology Daily

Translated title. Original: El dilema de la inteligencia artificial: ¿amenaza existencial o promesa inigualable? | Diario Tecnología

The document discusses whether artificial intelligence poses an existential threat, outlining plausible risk scenarios such as goal misalignment, loss of control, and malicious use. It emphasizes the need for stronger safety research, governance, and international regulation, while noting the uncertainty around when AGI might arrive.

Do we still have AI under control? | CZDEFENCE - Czech army and defence magazine

Translated title. Original: Máme AI ještě pod kontrolou? | CZDEFENCE - czech army and defence magazine

The article argues that the danger of AI lies not only in a literal rebellion but in gradual loss of human control as AI tools become more capable and embedded across society. It highlights non-binary, systemic risks from agentive systems, potential overreliance, and a Delphi-based assessment showing non-zero catastrophic risks by 2030, emphasizing risk reduction over unattainable zero risk.

Anthropic IPO: Investing in Humanity’s Risk? | FAZ

Translated title. Original: Anthropic plant Börsengang: Investieren ins Risiko der Menschheit? | FAZ

The piece discusses AI safety warnings from leading figures, questions whether the concerns are serious or satirical, and notes Anthropic's IPO ambitions as a move amid high public attention previously seen with SpaceX.

The AI industry should be regulated like pharmaceuticals or nuclear energy, analyst Brakel tells Bilance — ČT24 — Czech Television

Translated title. Original: AI průmysl by měl být regulován stejně jako léčiva nebo jádro, říká pro Bilanci analytik Brakel — ČT24 — Česká televize

Future of Life Institute analyst Mark Brakel says AI needs strict regulation and should be built to address specific human needs. He warns that people may lose control of AI through overreliance or harmful system behavior, and says targeted shutdown tools are not yet ready.

Politicians haven't understood yet. Here's what's happening around AI

Translated title. Original: Politycy jeszcze nie zrozumieli. Oto co dzieje się wokół AI

The piece highlights deeper-than-obvious anxieties as rational warnings about the future of AI, stressing that global catastrophe or energy/resource limits could impede AI autonomy and create unpredictable algorithmic problems.

If AI destroys humanity, it will take the form of “becoming unnecessary before anyone notices,” not a rebellion. — Chujo

Translated title. Original: AIが人類を滅ぼすなら、反乱ではなく「いつの間にか要らなくなる」形になる｜Chujo

The article argues existential AI risk comes in two forms: sudden, decisive events and slow, accumulative processes where humans become unnecessary. It outlines three abrupt pathways to risk (loss of control, misuse, competition) and two gradual pathways (disempowerment and self-disengagement), and emphasizes governance and societal design to preserve human agency and oversight.

The existential risk management of artificial intelligence - DB

Translated title. Original: La gestione del rischio esistenziale dell'intelligenza artificiale - DB

The document reviews existential risk estimates for AI, compares them to climate and other risks, and discusses legal and international measures to reduce risk while awaiting broader cooperation; it emphasizes cautious, case-by-case assessment and proposes initial policy interventions.

Microsoft AI chief says creating conscious AI would be reckless, praises Anthropic for being transparent

Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman cautions against developing conscious AI, argues there is no current evidence of machine consciousness, and calls for transparency and public handling of any signs. He warns conscious AI could threaten humanity and resources, and emphasizes that decisions should not be left to tech companies alone; he also praises Anthropic for openness.